News, Trends, and Insights for IT & Managed Services Providers
News, Trends, and Insights for IT & Managed Services Providers
Business of Tech | Signal reveals key details of police warrants

Hitting the use of warrants, Signal has released details of a search warrant from police in Santa Clara, California.    Quoting ZDNet:

In the search warrant, Santa Clara Police sought to get the name, street address, telephone number, and email address of a specific Signal user. It also wanted billing records, the dates of when the account was opened and registered, inbound and outbound call detail records, voicemails, video calls, emails, text messages, IP addresses along with dates and times for each login, and even all dates and times the user connected to Signal. 

In response to the search warrant, Signal provided law enforcement authorities with timestamps regarding the account specified in the search warrant. The timestamps showed the dates that the account last connected to Signal.

Signal said in a blog post that, by default, it does not collect the requested information from users.  

The company’s interaction with Santa Clara County police didn’t end there, however, as the law enforcement authorities then issued a non-disclosure order that required Signal to not publicly disclose that it received the search warrant. 
The non-disclosure order was then extended four times, which resulted in Signal’s request to unseal the search warrant being repeatedly pushed back. In total, it took Signal almost a full year before the company was able to legally publicly disclose the process it underwent when it received the search warrant.

Why do we care?

IT providers are going to need more legal expertise, that’s for sure.    I talk about data management as a service – use Signal as an extreme example.  They don’t collect much information at all about users, yet are also under pressure when law enforcement comes knocking.   

I’m “pro warrant” as an approach, in that I believe requiring justified, public documentation for the why of data collection is important.  In a business context, I still believe there should be justified documentation for the why of data collection because it minimizes risk to the business.   The risk of that data getting out – ransomware – or even damaging customer trust is a risk to offset.   Ask why a customer (or yourself) is collecting all that data.

Choose your upgrade:

Get the full benefits of Business of Tech Plus

Insider Access

$12/month

Perfect for MSPs and ITSPs that want full interviews, early access, and ad-free listening

  • Programmatic Ad-free private podcast feedSame show, little interruptions
  • Channel Chatter previews1–2 topics with light insights
  • Early access to interview episodesHear it days before public release
  • Monthly Insider BriefTighter analysis you can share internally
  • Extra audio segmentsCut interviews, behind-the-scenes commentary, quick competitive notes
  • Become an Insider for $12/month

    Leadership Access

    $149/month

    Perfect for MSPs and Vendors that run a team and need the extended tactics, executive summaries, and weekly alignment brief

  • All Insider Access benefits plus . . .
  • Invite your teamIncludes access for 5 team members with option to add more
  • Vendor Strategy BriefsThe entire library, plus new analysis every month
  • Channel ChatterAll topics, full insights, complete vendor discussion + sentiment list
  • Quarterly State of the Channel Briefing
  • Monthly AMA submission priorityAsk Dave direct questions, and skip the line
  • Get the Leadership Edge for $149/month

    Vendor Partner

    $500/month

    Perfect for channel companies or vendors looking to deepen their engagement with the show.

  • All Leadership Access benefits plus . . .
  • Get highlighted as a show sponsor You'll get placement in the show notes, throughout the website, and on our dedicated sponsors page.
  • Enjoy regular shout outs You'll be featured in a rotating format during the show
  • Become a show sponsor for $500/month

    Search all stories